One of the biggest changes in politics in my lifetime is that the delusional is no longer marginal. It has come in from the fringe, to sit in the seat of power in the Oval Office and in Congress.
For the first time in our history, ideology and theology hold a
monopoly of power in Washington. Theology asserts propositions that
cannot be proven true; ideologues hold stoutly to a worldview despite
being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality. The
offspring of ideology and theology are not always bad but they are
always blind. And that is the danger: voters and politicians alike,
oblivious to the facts.
One-third of the American electorate, if a recent Gallup Poll is
accurate, believes the Bible is literally true. This past November,
several million good and decent citizens went to the polls believing
in what is known as the "rapture index."
These true believers subscribe to a fantastical theology concocted
in the 19th century by a couple of immigrant preachers who took
disparate passages from the Bible and wove them into a narrative
that has captivated the imagination of millions of Americans. Its
outline is rather simple, if bizarre: Once Israel has occupied the
rest of its "biblical lands," legions of the Antichrist
will attack it, triggering a final showdown in the valley of Armageddon.
As the Jews who have not been converted are burned, the messiah
will return for the rapture. True believers will be lifted out of
their clothes and transported to heaven, where, seated next to the
right hand of God, they will watch their political and religious
opponents suffer plagues of boils, sores, locusts and frogs during
the several years of tribulation that follow.
I've reported on these people, following some of them from Texas to the West Bank. They are sincere, serious and polite as they tell you they feel called to help bring the rapture on as fulfillment of biblical prophecy. That is why they have declared solidarity with Israel and the Jewish settlements and backed up their support with money and volunteers. That is why the invasion of Iraq for them was a warm-up act, predicted in the Book of Revelations, where four angels "which are bound in the great river Euphrates will be released to slay the third part of man." For them a war with Islam in the Middle East is something to be welcomed - an essential conflagration on the road to redemption. The rapture index - "the prophetic speedometer of end-time activity" - now stands at 153.
So what does this mean for public policy and the environment? As
Glenn Scherer reports in the online environmental journal Grist,
millions of Christian fundamentalists believe that environmental
destruction is not only to be disregarded but hastened as a sign
of the coming apocalypse.
We're not talking about a handful of fringe lawmakers who hold
or are beholden to these beliefs. Nearly half of the members of
Congress are backed by the religious right. Forty-five senators
and 186 members of the 108th Congress earned 80 to 100 percent approval
ratings from the three most influential Christian-right advocacy
groups. They include Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Assistant
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Conference Chair Rick Santorum
of Pennsylvania, Policy Chair Jon Kyl of Arizona, House Speaker
Dennis Hastert and Majority Whip Roy Blunt. The only Democrat to
score 100 percent with the Christian Coalition was Sen. Zell Miller
of Georgia, who before his recent retirement quoted from the biblical
Book of Amos on the Senate floor: "The days will come, sayeth
the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land." He seemed
to relish the thought.
Onward Christian Soldiers
And why not? There's a constituency for it. A 2002 Time/CNN poll
found that 59 percent of Americans believe that the prophecies found
in the Book of Revelations are going to come true. Tune in to any
of the more than 1,600 Christian radio stations or flip on one of
the 250 Christian TV stations across the country and you can hear
some of this end-time gospel. And you will come to understand why
people under the spell of such potent prophecies cannot be expected,
as Grist puts it, "to worry about the environment. Why care
about the earth when the droughts, floods, famine and pestilence
brought by ecological collapse are signs of the apocalypse foretold
in the Bible?"
These people believe that until Christ does return, the Lord will
provide. One of their texts is a high school history book, America's
Providential History, which contains the following: "The secular
or socialist has a limited resource mentality and views the world
as a pie ... that needs to be cut up so everyone can get a piece."
However, "the Christian knows that the potential in God is
unlimited and that there is no shortage of resources in God's earth
… while many secularists view the world as overpopulated,
Christians know that God has made the earth sufficiently large with
plenty of resources to accommodate all of the people." No wonder
Karl Rove goes around the White House whistling that militant hymn,
"Onward Christian Soldiers." He turned out millions of
the foot soldiers in this past election, including many who have
made the apocalypse a powerful driving force in modern American
politics.
Once upon a time I thought that people would protect the natural
environment when they realized its importance to their health and
to the health and lives of their children. Now I am not so sure.
It's not that I don't want to believe that - it's just that I read
the news and connect the dots.
Immoral Imagination
Mike Leavitt, the former administrator of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, declared the election a mandate for President
Bush on the environment - a mandate for an administration that wants
to rewrite the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered
Species Act, as well as the National Environmental Policy Act, which
requires the government to judge beforehand if actions might damage
natural resources.
The Environmental Protection Agency had even planned to spend $9
million - $2 million of it from the administration's friends at
the American Chemistry Council - to pay poor families to continue
to use pesticides in their homes. These pesticides have been linked
to neurological damage in children, but instead of ordering an end
to their use, the government and the industry were going to offer
the families $970 each, as well as a camcorder and children's clothing,
to serve as guinea pigs for the study.
I read all this and then look at the pictures on my desk, next
to the computer - pictures of my grandchildren: Henry, age 12; Thomas,
age 10; Nancy, 7; Jassie, 3; Sara Jane, nine months. I see the future
looking back at me from those photographs and I say, "Father,
forgive us, for we know not what we do." And then I am stopped
short by the thought: "That's not right. We do know what we
are doing. We are stealing their future. Betraying their trust.
Despoiling their world."
And I ask myself: "Why? Is it because we don't care? Because
we are greedy? Because we have lost our capacity for outrage, our
ability to sustain indignation at injustice?"
What has happened to our moral imagination?
The news is not good these days. I can tell you that as a journalist
I know the news is never the end of the story. The news can be the
truth that sets us free - free to fight for the future we want.
And the will to fight is the antidote to despair, the cure for cynicism,
and the answer to those faces looking back at me from those photographs
on my desk.
What we need is what the ancient Israelites called "hocma"
- the science of the heart, the capacity to see, to feel and then
to act as if the future depended on you. Believe me, it does.
| |
|
 |
This article appeared in "The Star Tribune" (Minneapolis-St. Paul newspaper) on Jan. 30, 2005. The text is taken from Moyers’ remarks
upon receiving the Global Environmental Citizen Award from
the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard
Medical School.
A native of Oklahoma, Moyers is an award-winning journalist, best-selling author and well-known television documentarian, a “deep think” journalist who expanded the frontiers
of journalism by also serving as deputy
|
| director of the Peace Corps
in 1963 and press secretary to Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson from
1965-67. Moyers worked alternately on CBS and PBS in the 1970s
and ‘80s, then almost exclusively on PBS doing investigative
documentary and long-form conversations with some of the world’s
leading thinkers. Until recently, he was host of the weekly
public affairs series "NOW with Bill Moyers" on PBS.
His truth-telling landed him in an ongoing right-wing quagmire
of persecution by Capitol Hill and the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting. |
| |
|